Integrating Biophilic Design in Properties in Saudi Arabia

Amirah Al-Sofiany; Reem Al-Sabban

doi:10.33193/IJoHSS.64.2025.795

Amirah Al-Sofiany Master's Researcher, Department of Interior Design, College of Design and Arts, University of Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Reem Al-Sabban Professor, Department of Interior Design, College of Design and Arts, University of Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33193/IJoHSS.64.2025.795

الكلمات المفتاحية: Biophilic Design, Saudi Arabia, Sustainability, Cultural Sensitivity, Climate Adaptation, SWOT Analysis, Built Environment, Well-being, Property Development

الملخص

This study aims to assess the possibility of adopting biophilic design in properties in Saudi Arabia in the consideration of the climatic conditions within the region and Middle Eastern culture. It also aims to identify the extent to which the principles of biophilic design can be applied in Saudi Arabia considering the regional and cultural characteristics. Drawing on the results of the systematic literature review and the analysis of 72 biophilic design features, the study outlines guidelines for applying biophilic design solutions, including the contextual relevance of the climate, culture, and conducting a SWOT analysis. The strategies highlighted in the study include Natural Ventilation which entails maximizing on the provision of natural air through doors and windows, Shading which involves the use of shading devices to reduce the level of heat penetration and Drought Tolerant Native Plants that allows for the implementation of plant species that can grow best under dry conditions. Additionally, the study also brought into the limelight the call to incorporate traditional design features, local materials, and imagery to improve the perception of place and promote a better relationship between people and their surroundings. Overall, the study establishes that there are huge benefits of embracing biophilic design in Saudi Arabia including better health of the occupants, high performance and increase sustainability of the environment. Nevertheless, the management of the creative process is significant for practical application and needs cooperation of architects, designers, developers, policymakers, and the public. Research opportunities for the future are to outline recommendations on how to implement biophilic design in everyday practice and identify key performance indicators, evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biophilic design, and investigate the possibilities of integrating biophilic design into heritage buildings. Thus, by drawing a link between humans and nature, this research will help to foster a sustainable, healthy and culturally enhanced built environment in Saudi Arabia.

المراجع

1. Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J., & Mador, M. (2008). Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. John Wiley & Sons.
2. Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. O. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design: Improving health and well-being in the built environment. Terrapin Bright Green LLC.
3. Terrapin Bright Green. (2012). The economics of biophilia: Why designing with nature in mind makes financial sense. Terrapin Bright Green LLC.
4. Al-Homoud, M. S. (2019). The role of biophilic design in the development of sustainable cities in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(2), 170-181.
5. Al-Shayeb, A. M. (2021). Biophilic design in urban public spaces in Saudi Arabia: Assessing perceptions and preferences. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 60, 127106.
6. Downton, P., Jones, D., Zeunert, J., & Roös, P. (2017). Biophilic design applications: Putting theory and patterns into built environment practice. KnE Engineering, 59-65.‏
7. Bettaieb, D. M., & Alsabban, R. F. (2023). Users' role in applying biophilic attributes to the interiors of residential spaces. Open House International, 48(1), 163-184.‏
8. Alhefnawi, M. A. (2022). Integrating the biophilia physiognomies in the context of Neom smart city in Saudi Arabia. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 21(2), 159-171.‏
9. Bin Sulaiman, F. F. (2021). Assessing Biophilic Criteria in Urban Neighborhoods of Saudi Arabia: A Case Study of the Diplomatic Quarter in Riyadh City. Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector, 16(59), 300-324.
10. Clemson, A. (2018). The Biophilic Office: A Guide to Creating a Healthier and More Productive Workplace. Routledge.
11. Beatley, T. (2019). Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and Planning. Island Press.
12. Leach, S. (2015). Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. John Wiley & Sons.
13. Taylor, S. (2019). Biophilic Design for Architecture and Interiors: An Introduction. Routledge.
14. Al-Amoudi, M. (2021). Biophilic Design in Saudi Arabia: A Cultural Perspective. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Design, 10(2), 123-135.
15. Al-Ghamdi, S., Al-Harbi, M., & Al-Otaibi, A. (2022). The Role of Biophilic Design in Reducing Energy Consumption in Buildings in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 41(3), 257-268.
16. Al-Harbi, M. (2022). The Use of Traditional Building Materials in Biophilic Design: A Case Study of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 39(2), 115-128.
17. El-Ghandour, A. (2020). The Role of Native Plants in Biophilic Design in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 109987.