Linguistic Disintegration in the Political Speeches of President George W. Bush
الملخص
Disintegration is a method whose dialectical potential depends on dividing a single concept into two parts, where they are portrayed as unequal by presenting one as more important than the other. Disintegration consists of speech act, presuppositions, and conversational implication, as well as spatial and temporal characterization and positive and negative politeness strategies, Politicians tend to use persuasive appeals, repetition, metaphor, analogy, exaggeration, and manipulation. Therefore, this study seeks to study the Disintegration in the political discourses of US President "George W. Advocates the use of disintegration in political speeches.
المراجع
2. Agnieszka Grzywna, 2013, “Manipulation and Pragmatics in Political Discourse”, In I. Kecskes and J. Romero – Trillo (eds.), Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, Boston and Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
3. Alex Preminger, 1993, Terry V.F. Brogan, and Frank J. Warnke, The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
4. Arne Naess, 1966, Communication and Argument: Elements of Applied Semantics, California: Bedminster Press.
5. Arthur Quinn and Lyon Rathbun, 2009, “Polysyndeton”, In T. Enos (ed.), Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age, New York: Routledge.
6. Corina Andone and Anca Gâţă, 2011, “Manoeuvring Strategically with Disintergration in a Political Interview”. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen and F. Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Keeping in Touch with Pragma – Dialectics: In Honor of Frans H. van Eemeren, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
7. Daniel J. O’Keefe, 1992, “Two Concepts of Argument”, In W. L. Benoit, D. Hample and P. J. Benoit (eds.), Readings in Argumentation: Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis, New York and Berlin: Foris Publications.
8. David Goodwin, 1992, The Dialectic of Second – Order Distinctions: The Structure of Arguments about Fallacies, Informal Logic (journal), University of Windsor, Canada, Vol. 14, No. 2.
9. David Zarefsky, 2014, Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays, New York and London: Springer US.
10. Elizabeth Minchin, 2001, “Similes in Homer: Image, Mind's Eye, and Memory”. In J. Watson (ed.), Speaking Volumes Orality & Literacy in the Greek & Roman World, Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.
11. Fran Piazza, 2013, “Rhetoric and Pragmatics: Suggestions for a Fruitful Dialogue”, In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo and M. Carapezza, Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, London and New York: Springer US.
12. George W. Bush, The American Presidency Project, California: University of California, On the website: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu.
13. Hana Ahmed Muhammad Shuwaikh, 2012, Health psychology, Cairo: Anglo – Egyptian books.
14. Herbert W. Simons, 1976, Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis, Boston: Addison – Wesley Publishing Company.
15. Hervé Corvellec, 2008, Introducing the New Rhetoric into organization studies, Göteborg: Gothenburg Research Institute.
16. J. R. Cox, 1986, “Argument and Usable Traditions”, In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation: Across the lines of discipline, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris Publications.
17. John A. Cuddon and Claire E. Preston, 1999, The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory, (4th ed.), London: Penguin.
18. Jonathan Charteris Black, 2011, Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, (2nd ed.), New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. K. M. Olson, 2013, “Intransigence and Self – Justification as a Political Way of Life”, In Clarke Rountree (ed.), Venomous Speech: Problems with American Political Discourse on the Right and Left, California: ABC – CLIO.
20. Magedah E. Shabo, 2010, Rhetoric, Logic, and Argumentation: A Guide for Student Writers, Delaware: Prestwick House, Inc.
21. Marc Swartz, 1976, “Hyperbole, Politics and Potent Specifications: the Political Uses of a Figure of Speech”, In W. O’Barr and J. O’Barr (eds.), Language and Politics, The Hague: Mouton.
22. Murray Knowles and Rosamund Moon, 2006, Introducing Metaphor, London and New York: Routledge.
23. Olcay Sert, 2008, “An Interactive Analysis of Hyperboles in a British TV Series: Implications for EFL Classes”, In ARECLS, Newcastle University, England, vol. 5.
24. Robert Cockcroft, Susan Cockcroft and Craig Hamilton, 2014, Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Ruth Amossy, 2007, Commentary on M . A . van Rees: “Dialectical and Rhetorical Effects of Disintergration”, In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson and D. M. Godden (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, Proceedings of the 7th OSSA Conference, United kingdom: University of Windsor.
26. Samuel Gyasi Obeng and Beverly Hartford, 2002, Surviving Through Obliqueness: Language of Politics in Emerging Democracies, New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
27. Sharon Crowley and Debra Hawhee, 2004, Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students, New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
28. van Dijk, 2006, T. A. Discourse and manipulation, London: Sage Publications.
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2024 Asst. Prof. Dr. Adawiya Hayyawi Doohee

هذا العمل مرخص حسب الرخصة Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.