International Justice between International Judicial Decisions and the Interests of Major Powers

Abstract

Law in general can be considered one of the social phenomena whose existence and development are linked to the existence and development of the society that it regulates and governs. It is natural that the rules of public international law have developed tremendously as a response to the rapid and successive developments that have afflicted the international community in recent years. The features of this development have emerged in particular in the extension of the rules of public international law to apply to areas and topics that were, until recently, subject to internal laws. Such an extension led to the emergence of new branches of this law characterized by a kind of privacy and subjectivity, and despite that, they remained a document. Connecting with him and even following him. The change in the traditional view, which considered human rights to be an internal issue, led to them being considered an international issue. These rights, determining their types, and how to enjoy and respect them, became the subject of two new branches of international law, namely, international human rights law and international humanitarian law. Then, the attack and violation of these rights is... Its wide scope by states has led to the need for another means of achieving international criminal protection These rights were the reason for the birth of a modern branch of public international law, the function of which is to grant international criminal protection to these rights, which is international criminal law. Today, international criminal law has become an important branch of public international law, and this branch has clear importance in conferring international criminal protection on interests of notable importance in society. International issues, especially human rights, as well as at the same time ensuring the continuation of international life and the consistency and stability of aspects of friendly relations and their regularity between countries.            We believe that the requirements of a realistic view of this branch of public international law necessarily require familiarity with the fundamental issues and problems it contains that may be the reason for limiting its effectiveness in performing its role in protecting human rights or narrowing the scope of its application and comprehensiveness.